A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe (can't PUT from an HTML form or such) but POST allows creating in-order keys that an attacker can send.
Advisories
Source ID Title
EUVD EUVD EUVD-2022-0838 A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe (can't PUT from an HTML form or such) but POST allows creating in-order keys that an attacker can send.
Github GHSA Github GHSA GHSA-5gjm-fj42-x983 etcd Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fixes

Solution

No solution given by the vendor.


Workaround

No workaround given by the vendor.

History

No history.

Projects

Sign in to view the affected projects.

cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: redhat

Published:

Updated: 2024-08-05T03:51:48.502Z

Reserved: 2017-12-04T00:00:00

Link: CVE-2018-1098

cve-icon Vulnrichment

No data.

cve-icon NVD

Status : Modified

Published: 2018-04-03T16:29:00.237

Modified: 2024-11-21T03:59:10.670

Link: CVE-2018-1098

cve-icon Redhat

Severity : Moderate

Publid Date: 2018-03-07T00:00:00Z

Links: CVE-2018-1098 - Bugzilla

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

No data.

Weaknesses