Search Results (40702 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2023-4316 1 Zod 1 Zod 2025-12-03 7.5 High
Zod in versions 3.21.0 up to and including 3.22.3 allows an attacker to perform a denial of service while validating emails.
CVE-2025-52099 1 Sqlite 1 Sqlite 2025-12-03 5.3 Medium
DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-29088. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2025-29088. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-29088 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
CVE-2018-16451 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more 6 Mac Os X, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
The SMB parser in tcpdump before 4.9.3 has buffer over-reads in print-smb.c:print_trans() for \MAILSLOT\BROWSE and \PIPE\LANMAN.
CVE-2018-16230 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more 6 Mac Os X, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
The BGP parser in tcpdump before 4.9.3 has a buffer over-read in print-bgp.c:bgp_attr_print() (MP_REACH_NLRI).
CVE-2018-16228 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more 6 Mac Os X, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
The HNCP parser in tcpdump before 4.9.3 has a buffer over-read in print-hncp.c:print_prefix().
CVE-2023-0842 1 Xml2js Project 1 Xml2js 2025-12-03 5.3 Medium
xml2js version 0.4.23 allows an external attacker to edit or add new properties to an object. This is possible because the application does not properly validate incoming JSON keys, thus allowing the __proto__ property to be edited.
CVE-2022-41713 1 Deep-object-diff Project 1 Deep-object-diff 2025-12-03 5.3 Medium
deep-object-diff version 1.1.0 allows an external attacker to edit or add new properties to an object. This is possible because the application does not properly validate incoming JSON keys, thus allowing the '__proto__' property to be edited.
CVE-2022-42743 1 Deep-parse-json Project 1 Deep-parse-json 2025-12-03 5.3 Medium
deep-parse-json version 1.0.2 allows an external attacker to edit or add new properties to an object. This is possible because the application does not correctly validate the incoming JSON keys, thus allowing the '__proto__' property to be edited.
CVE-2022-41714 1 Fastest-json-copy Project 1 Fastest-json-copy 2025-12-03 5.3 Medium
fastest-json-copy version 1.0.1 allows an external attacker to edit or add new properties to an object. This is possible because the application does not correctly validate the incoming JSON keys, thus allowing the '__proto__' property to be edited.
CVE-2024-29037 1 Datahub 1 Datahub-helm 2025-12-03 9.1 Critical
datahub-helm provides the Kubernetes Helm charts for deploying Datahub and its dependencies on a Kubernetes cluster. Starting in version 0.1.143 and prior to version 0.2.182, due to configuration issues in the helm chart, if there was a successful initial deployment during a limited window of time, personal access tokens were possibly created with a default secret key. Since the secret key is a static, publicly available value, someone could inspect the algorithm used to generate personal access tokens and generate their own for an instance. Deploying with Metadata Service Authentication enabled would have been difficult during window of releases. If someone circumvented the helm settings and manually set Metadata Service Authentication to be enabled using environment variables directly, this would skip over the autogeneration logic for the Kubernetes Secrets and DataHub GMS would default to the signing key specified statically in the application.yml. Most deployments probably did not attempt to circumvent the helm settings to enable Metadata Service Authentication during this time, so impact is most likely limited. Any deployments with Metadata Service Authentication enabled should ensure that their secret values are properly randomized. Version 0.2.182 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may reset the token signing key to be a random value, which will invalidate active personal access tokens.
CVE-2025-11788 2 Circutor, Sge-plc1000 Sge-plc50 5 Sge-plc1000, Sge-plc1000 Firmware, Sge-plc50 and 2 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2. In the 'ShowSupervisorParameters()' function, there is an unlimited user input that is copied to a fixed-size buffer via 'sprintf()'. The 'GetParameter(meter)' function retrieves the user input, which is directly incorporated into a buffer without size validation. An attacker can provide an excessively large input for the 'meter' parameter.
CVE-2022-50279 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-12-03 7.1 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtlwifi: Fix global-out-of-bounds bug in _rtl8812ae_phy_set_txpower_limit() There is a global-out-of-bounds reported by KASAN: BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte.part.0+0x3d/0x84 [rtl8821ae] Read of size 1 at addr ffffffffa0773c43 by task NetworkManager/411 CPU: 6 PID: 411 Comm: NetworkManager Tainted: G D 6.1.0-rc8+ #144 e15588508517267d37 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), Call Trace: <TASK> ... kasan_report+0xbb/0x1c0 _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte.part.0+0x3d/0x84 [rtl8821ae] rtl8821ae_phy_bb_config.cold+0x346/0x641 [rtl8821ae] rtl8821ae_hw_init+0x1f5e/0x79b0 [rtl8821ae] ... </TASK> The root cause of the problem is that the comparison order of "prate_section" in _rtl8812ae_phy_set_txpower_limit() is wrong. The _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte() is used to compare the first n bytes of the two strings from tail to head, which causes the problem. In the _rtl8812ae_phy_set_txpower_limit(), it was originally intended to meet this requirement by carefully designing the comparison order. For example, "pregulation" and "pbandwidth" are compared in order of length from small to large, first is 3 and last is 4. However, the comparison order of "prate_section" dose not obey such order requirement, therefore when "prate_section" is "HT", when comparing from tail to head, it will lead to access out of bounds in _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte(). As mentioned above, the _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte() has the same function as strcmp(), so just strcmp() is enough. Fix it by removing _rtl8812ae_eq_n_byte() and use strcmp() barely. Although it can be fixed by adjusting the comparison order of "prate_section", this may cause the value of "rate_section" to not be from 0 to 5. In addition, commit "21e4b0726dc6" not only moved driver from staging to regular tree, but also added setting txpower limit function during the driver config phase, so the problem was introduced by this commit.
CVE-2025-11789 2 Circutor, Sge-plc1000 Sge-plc50 5 Sge-plc1000, Sge-plc1000 Firmware, Sge-plc50 and 2 more 2025-12-03 7.5 High
Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2. The 'DownloadFile' function converts a parameter to an integer using 'atoi()' and then uses it as an index in the 'FilesDownload' array with '(&FilesDownload)[iVar2]'. If the parameter is too large, it will access memory beyond the limits.
CVE-2019-15167 1 Tcpdump 1 Tcpdump 2025-12-03 9.1 Critical
The VRRP parser in tcpdump before 4.9.3 has a buffer over-read in print-vrrp.c:vrrp_print() for VRRP version 3, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-14463.
CVE-2019-15166 8 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 5 more 10 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 7 more 2025-12-03 1.6 Low
lmp_print_data_link_subobjs() in print-lmp.c in tcpdump before 4.9.3 lacks certain bounds checks.
CVE-2025-66361 1 Logpoint 1 Siem 2025-12-03 6.5 Medium
An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.7.0. Sensitive information is exposed in System Processes for an extended period during high CPU load.
CVE-2025-11785 2 Circutor, Sge-plc1000 Sge-plc50 5 Sge-plc1000, Sge-plc1000 Firmware, Sge-plc50 and 2 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2. In the 'ShowMeterPasswords()' function, there is an unlimited user input that is copied to a fixed-size buffer via 'sprintf()'. The 'GetParameter(meter)' function retrieves the user input, which is directly incorporated into a buffer without size validation. An attacker can provide an excessively large input for the 'meter' parameter.
CVE-2025-11786 2 Circutor, Sge-plc1000 Sge-plc50 5 Sge-plc1000, Sge-plc1000 Firmware, Sge-plc50 and 2 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2. In the 'SetUserPassword()' function, the 'newPassword' parameter is directly embedded in a shell command string using 'sprintf()' without any sanitisation or validation, and then executed using 'system()'. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands that will be executed with the same privileges as the application.
CVE-2025-11784 2 Circutor, Sge-plc1000 Sge-plc50 5 Sge-plc1000, Sge-plc1000 Firmware, Sge-plc50 and 2 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2. In the 'ShowMeterDatabase()' function, there is an unlimited user input that is copied to a fixed-size buffer via 'sprintf()'. The 'GetParameter(meter)' function retrieves the user input, which is directly incorporated into a buffer without size validation. An attacker can provide an excessively large input for the 'meter' parameter.
CVE-2025-11783 2 Circutor, Sge-plc1000 Sge-plc50 5 Sge-plc1000, Sge-plc1000 Firmware, Sge-plc50 and 2 more 2025-12-03 9.8 Critical
Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2. The vulnerability is found in the 'AddEvent()' function when copying the user-controlled username input to a fixed-size buffer (48 bytes) without boundary checking. This can lead to memory corruption, resulting in possible remote code execution.