| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The ip package before 1.1.9 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 0x7f.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. |
| ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/index.php. |
| iCMS v7.0.16 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at admincp.php. |
| ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /manager/index.php. |
| kkFileView 4.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via controller\OnlinePreviewController.java. |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface, which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause the appliance to make requests to an unintended location. |
| A security issue was discovered in WeBid <=1.2.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the admin/theme.php file allows remote attackers to inject payloads via theme parameters to read files across directories. |
| The Broken Link Checker WordPress plugin before 2.4.2 does not validate a the link URLs before making a request to them, which could allow admin users to perform SSRF attack, for example on a multisite installation. |
| An issue in open-emr before v.7.0.2 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via a crafted script to the formid parameter in the ereq_form.php component. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in wuzhicms 4.1.0. This affects the function test of the file coreframe/app/search/admin/config.php. The manipulation of the argument sphinxhost/sphinxport leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| Red Hat Product Security has come to the conclusion that this CVE is not needed. The problem described was inteded behavior and therefore not a bug. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Varun Dubey Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress: from n/a through 1.4.4. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPWebinarSystem WebinarPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WebinarPress: from n/a through 1.33.27. |
| In NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2, the key state is not checked before use, potentially leading to spacecraft hijacking. |
| A vulnerability was found in playeduxyz PlayEdu 开源培训系统 up to 1.8 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/backend/v1/user/create of the component User Avatar Handler. The manipulation of the argument Avatar leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Espressif ESP32 chips allow 29 hidden HCI commands, such as 0xFC02 (Write memory). |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in a-blog cms Ver.3.1.x series versions prior to Ver.3.1.12 and Ver.3.0.x series versions prior to Ver.3.0.32. If this vulnerability is exploited, a user with an administrator or higher privilege who can log in to the product may obtain arbitrary files on the server and information on the internal server that is not disclosed to the public. |
| The Blog2Social: Social Media Auto Post & Scheduler WordPress plugin before 6.9.10 does not have authorisation in an AJAX action, and does not ensure that the URL to make a request to is an external one. As a result, any authenticated users, such as subscriber could perform SSRF attacks |
| An XPath Injection vulnerability due to Improper Input Validation in the J-Web component of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an authenticated attacker to add an XPath command to the XPath stream, which may allow chaining to other unspecified vulnerabilities, leading to a partial loss of confidentiality. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: all versions prior to 19.1R3-S9; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S6; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S7; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S7, 19.4R3-S8; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S5; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S5; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S5; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S4; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S2; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S1; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R2-S2, 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R1-S2, 21.4R2-S1, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S1, 22.1R2. |
| An XPath Injection vulnerability in the J-Web component of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated attacker sending a crafted POST to reach the XPath channel, which may allow chaining to other unspecified vulnerabilities, leading to a partial loss of confidentiality. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: all versions prior to 19.1R3-S9; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S6; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S7; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S9; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S5; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S5; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S5; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S4; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S1; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R1-S2, 21.4R2; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S1, 22.1R2. |
