| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Rhymix before 2.1.24 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the background import data function because XML documents may contain external entities. |
| go-git is a highly extensible git implementation library written in pure Go. Prior to 5.16.5, a vulnerability was discovered in go-git whereby data integrity values for .pack and .idx files were not properly verified. This resulted in go-git potentially consuming corrupted files, which would likely result in unexpected errors such as object not found. For context, clients fetch packfiles from upstream Git servers. Those files contain a checksum of their contents, so that clients can perform integrity checks before consuming it. The pack indexes (.idx) are generated locally by go-git, or the git cli, when new .pack files are received and processed. The integrity checks for both files were not being verified correctly. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.16.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Revisions revisionary allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PublishPress Revisions: from n/a through <= 3.7.22. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 could provide weaker than expected security during system administration of security settings. |
| AVideo Platform 8.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to reset user passwords by exploiting the password recovery mechanism. Attackers can craft malicious requests to the recoverPass endpoint using the user's recovery token to change account credentials without authentication. |
| '.../...//' in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Dynamics 365 FastTrack Implementation Assets allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| '.../...//' in Microsoft Purview allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust's `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer. |
| OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.2.14, browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins. A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the browser control service is reachable on loopback in the victim's browser context. Starting in version 2026.2.14, mutating HTTP methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) are rejected when the request indicates a non-loopback Origin/Referer (or `Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site`). Other mitigations include enabling browser control auth (token/password) and avoid running with auth disabled. |
| Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the MAC filtering configuration interface. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick users into adding unauthorized MAC addresses to the device's filtering rules without their consent. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpzita Zita Elementor Site Library zita-site-library allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zita Elementor Site Library: from n/a through <= 1.6.6. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpcoachify Coachify coachify allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Coachify: from n/a through <= 1.1.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themastercut Revision Manager TMC revision-manager-tmc allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Revision Manager TMC: from n/a through <= 2.8.22. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themes4WP Popularis Extra popularis-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Popularis Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.10. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress RealPress realpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RealPress: from n/a through <= 1.1.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Moose Kenta Companion kenta-companion allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Kenta Companion: from n/a through <= 1.3.3. |
| The Whatsiplus Scheduled Notification for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'wsnfw_save_users_settings' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Login Time Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Login Time Restriction: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.3. |
