| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| On Netis WF2411 with firmware 2.1.36123 and other Netis WF2xxx devices (possibly WF2411 through WF2880), there is a stack-based buffer overflow that does not require authentication. This can cause denial of service (device restart) or remote code execution. This vulnerability can be triggered by a GET request with a long HTTP "Authorization: Basic" header that is mishandled by user_auth->user_ok in /bin/boa. |
| WordPress before 4.9.9 and 5.x before 5.0.1 allows remote code execution because an _wp_attached_file Post Meta entry can be changed to an arbitrary string, such as one ending with a .jpg?file.php substring. An attacker with author privileges can execute arbitrary code by uploading a crafted image containing PHP code in the Exif metadata. Exploitation can leverage CVE-2019-8943. |
| SolarWinds Orion NPM before 12.4 suffers from a SYSTEM remote code execution vulnerability in the OrionModuleEngine service. This service establishes a NetTcpBinding endpoint that allows remote, unauthenticated clients to connect and call publicly exposed methods. The InvokeActionMethod method may be abused by an attacker to execute commands as the SYSTEM user. |
| An issue was discovered in Thomson Reuters Desktop Extensions 1.9.0.358. An unauthenticated directory traversal and local file inclusion vulnerability in the ThomsonReuters.Desktop.Service.exe and ThomsonReuters.Desktop.exe allows a remote attacker to list or enumerate sensitive contents of files via a \.. to port 6677. Additionally, this could allow for privilege escalation by dumping the affected machine's SAM and SYSTEM database files, as well as remote code execution. |
| Stored XSS in Invision Power Board versions 3.3.1 - 3.4.8 leads to Remote Code Execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with system data manipulation privileges can execute aribitrary code through arbitrary file deletion and OS command injection. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to modify store configurations can manipulate the connector api endpoint to enable remote code execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with privileges to modify product catalogs can trigger PHP file inclusion through a crafted XML file that specifies product design update. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shippment settings can execute arbitrary code through server-side request forgery due to unsafe handling of a carrier gateway. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with privileges to manipulate layouts and images can insert a malicious payload into the page layout. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An unauthenticated user can insert a malicious payload through PageBuilder template methods. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.19, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3. An authenticated user with administrative privileges (system level import) can execute arbitrary code through a Phar deserialization vulnerability in the import functionality. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with privileges to manipulate CMS section of the website can trigger remote code execution via custom layout update. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. Dependency injection through Symphony framework allows service identifiers to be derived from user controlled data, which can lead to remote code execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 1 prior to 1.9.x and 1.14.x. An authenticated admin user can modify configuration parameters via crafted support configuration. The modification can lead to remote code execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.19, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3. An authenticated user with privileges to create products can craft custom layout update and use import product functionality to enable remote code execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.19, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3. An authenticated admin user with import product privileges can delete files through bulk product import and inject code into XSLT file. The combination of these manipulations can lead to remote code execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 1 prior to 1.9.4.3 and 1.14.4.3, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to import features can execute arbitrary code via crafted configuration archive file upload. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user can leverage plugin functionality related to email templates to manipulate the interceptor class in a way that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user can leverage email templates hierarchy to manipulate the interceptor class in a way that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
