| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior lack CSRF protections for state-changing actions in the administrative interface. An attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into performing unauthorized configuration changes. |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior reflect unsanitized user input in the web interface, allowing an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of an authenticated user. |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior expose user passwords in plaintext within the administrative interface and HTTP responses, allowing recovery of valid credentials. |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware versions prior to V300SP10260209 generate predictable numeric session identifiers in the web management interface. An attacker can guess valid session IDs and hijack authenticated sessions. |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior contain hard-coded administrative credentials that cannot be changed by users. Knowledge of these credentials allows full administrative access to the device. |
| Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior contain a command injection vulnerability in the traceroute diagnostic function of the affected device web management interface. By injecting the %1a character into the hostname parameter, an authenticated attacker with access to the web interface can execute arbitrary CLI commands on the device. |
| A post-authentication Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in SonicOS allows a remote attacker to crash a firewall. |
| A post-authentication NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in SonicOS allows a remote attacker to crash a firewall. |
| A post-authentication Format String vulnerability in SonicOS allows a remote attacker to crash a firewall. |
| Multiple post-authentication stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the SonicOS management interface due to improper bounds checking in a API endpoint. |
| FUXA 1.2.8 and prior contains an Authentication Bypass vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). The vulnerability exists in the server/api/jwt-helper.js middleware, which improperly trusts the HTTP "Referer" header to validate internal requests. A remote unauthenticated attacker can bypass JWT authentication by spoofing the Referer header to match the server's host. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to access the protected /api/runscript endpoint and execute arbitrary Node.js code on the server. |
| Privilege escalation and improper access control in GCOM EPON 1GE C00R371V00B01 allows remote authenticated users to modify administrator only settings and extract administrator credentials. |
| Download of Code Without Integrity Check vulnerability in Microchip Time Provider 4100 allows Malicious Manual Software Update.This issue affects Time Provider 4100: before 2.5. |
| Airflow versions before 2.11.1 have a vulnerability that allows authenticated users with audit log access to see sensitive values in audit logs which they should not see. When sensitive connection parameters were set via airflow CLI, values of those variables appeared in the audit log and were stored unencrypted in the Airflow database. While this risk is limited to users with audit log access, it is recommended to upgrade to Airflow 2.11.1 or a later version, which addresses this issue. Users who previously used the CLI to set connections should manually delete entries with those connection sensitive values from the log table. This is similar but not the same issue as CVE-2024-50378 |
| DAG Author (who already has quite a lot of permissions) could manipulate database of Airflow 2 in the way to execute arbitrary code in the web-server context, which they should normally not be able to do, leading to potentially remote code execution in the context of web-server (server-side) as a result of a user viewing historical task information.
The functionality responsible for that (log template history) has been disabled by default in 2.11.1 and users should upgrade to Airflow 3 if they want to continue to use log template history. They can also manually modify historical log file names if they want to see historical logs that were generated before the last log template change. |
| <p>An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows when Folder redirection has been enabled via Group Policy. When folder redirection file server is co-located with Terminal server, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability would be able to begin redirecting another user's personal data to a created folder.</p>
<p>To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker can create a new folder under the Folder Redirection root path and create a junction on a newly created User folder. When the new user logs in, Folder Redirection would start redirecting to the folder and copying personal data.</p>
<p>This elevation of privilege vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring Folder Redirection with Offline files and restricting permissions, and NOT via a security update for affected Windows Servers. See the <strong>FAQ</strong> section of this CVE for configuration guidance.</p> |
| Failure to validate inputs in SMM may allow an attacker to create a mishandled error leaving the DRTM UApp in a partially initialized state potentially resulting in loss of memory integrity. |
| <p>Depending on configuration of various package managers it is possible for an attacker to insert a malicious package into a package manager's repository which can be retrieved and used during development, build, and release processes. This insertion could lead to remote code execution. We believe this vulnerability affects multiple package managers across multiple languages, including but not limited to: Python/pip, .NET/NuGet, Java/Maven, JavaScript/npm.</p>
<p><strong>Attack scenarios</strong></p>
<p>An attacker could take advantage of this ecosystem-wide issue to cause harm in a variety of ways. The original attack scenarios were discovered by Alex Birsan and are detailed in their whitepaper, <a href="https://medium.com/@alex.birsan/dependency-confusion-4a5d60fec610">Dependency Confusion: How I Hacked Into Apple, Microsoft and Dozens of Other Companies</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><p>With basic knowledge of the target ecosystems, an attacker could create an empty shell for a package and insert malicious code in the install scripts, give it a high version, and publish it to the public repository. Vulnerable victim machines will download the higher version of the package between the public and private repositories and attempt to install it. Due to code incompatibility it will probably error out upon import or upon compilation, making it easier to detect; however the attacker would have gained code execution by that point.</p>
</li>
<li><p>An advanced attacker with some inside knowledge of the target could take a copy of a working package, insert the malicious code (in the package itself or in the install), and then publish it to a public repository. The package will likely install and import correctly, granting the attacker an initial foothold and persistence.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>These two methods could affect target organizations at any of these various levels:</p>
<ul>
<li>Developer machines</li>
<li>An entire team if the configuration to import the malicious package is uploaded to a code repository</li>
<li>Continuous integration pipelines if they pull the malicious packages during the build, test, and/or deploy stages</li>
<li>Customers, download servers, production services if the malicious code has not been detected</li>
</ul>
<p>This remote code execution vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring installation tools and workflows, and not by correcting anything in the package repositories themselves. See the <strong>FAQ</strong> section of this CVE for configuration guidance.</p> |
| By exploiting a time of check to time of use (TOCTOU) race condition during the Endpoint Security for Linux Threat Prevention and Firewall (ENSL TP/FW) installation process, a local user can perform a privilege escalation attack to obtain administrator privileges for the purpose of executing arbitrary code through insecure use of predictable temporary file locations. |
| A vulnerability was determined in libvips up to 8.19.0. The affected element is the function vips_source_read_to_memory of the file libvips/iofuncs/source.c. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Patch name: a56feecbe9ed66521d9647ec9fbcd2546eccd7ee. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue. The confirmation of the bugfix mentions: "[T]he impact of this is negligible, since this only affects custom seekable sources larger than 4 GiB (and the crash occurs in user code rather than libvips itself)." |
